Joy Behar OK With Clinton's & Kennedy's Treatment of Women, Slams Trump Over 'Sexual Harassment'

Liberal hypocrisy exhibit # 7,345,671.

The "Eternal Idiocy of the Leftist Mind" should be the title of a documentary that examines the vacuous gray matter inside purported comedienne Joy Behar's head to find out, from a scientific perspective, what has gone horribly wrong. 

The View host (at far left in photo) is very concerned about how GOP presidential contender Donald Trump treats women and blasted him for being a "liar." Make note -- Behar once said that both sexual predator Bill Clinton and woman-murderer Teddy Kennedy had her "vote" despite their deplorable behavior because, after all, they voted for "women's rights."

This is the warped mind of the leftist: To actually believe that a serial-rapist and a man who "allegedly" drowned his pregnant girlfriend care a hoot for women's rights. Newsbusters provides the details: 

On the allegation that the businessman kissed a beauty contestant on the lips, Behar raged, “That's called sexual harassment! No one likes some big, overweight guy [forcing themselves on you]."

“He's a liar, because he already admitted that it was him. Now he says it’s not him. He’s a liar. He’s the one who calls Hillary a liar?” 

Behar’s sudden concern for the truth and the dignity of women is hard to square with her comments about sleazy Democrats. On January 5, 2016, Behar admitted that she doesn’t care about sexual harassment, so long as the transgressors are Democrats:  

JOY BEHAR: Teddy Kennedy. Remember Chappaquiddick? Am I the oldest person in the room? Chappaquiddick.  I mean, a girl drowns and he abandons her and she drowned and women still voted for Teddy Kennedy. Why? Because he voted for women's rights. That's why. That's the bottom line of it in my opinion. I mean, I don't like either one of them, to tell you the truth, Teddy or Bill. They're both dogs as far as I'm concerned. But I still will vote for Bill Clinton because he votes in my favor.

On Monday, Behar said of the New York Times piece: “Are we gonna ask, blame Melania or this piece in the Times? So don't go after Hillary." Of course, as the MRC’s Kristine Marsh noted, “Hillary Clinton was not an innocent bystander during her husband’s affairs. She has a record of being complicit in his sexual misconduct, even threatening and bullying his victims to keep quiet." 

To process information in such a warped, intellectually inconsistent fashion, seems to defy nature. We truly hope Behar will consider donating her brain to science one day -- for the good of humanity. 

Issues

People